Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at this
Re: Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at
aka stupid shit with no real facts just endless degrees of kevin bacon crap
Get The Empire Unmasked here
-
Moreflourideplease
- Protesting War
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:50 pm
- Location: NYC
Re: Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at
heh, mine wasn't a question that warranted an answerMoreflourideplease wrote:Nope.
-
PlutoCharon
- Revolutionary Party
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:37 pm
Re: Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at
If David Icke or the late Zecharia Sitchin ever had anything to say that was rooted in fact, the fringe stuff discredits it. Some of their original info is sort of rooted in fact for sure, David Icke talked about the global elite families and Sitchin talked about a potential planet that smashed into the Earth and created the moon. It just got weird after than. Maybe there was a disinformation campaign against them or something. Either way, it makes it difficult to talk openly about the whole Zionism thing without somebody rolling their eyes and mentioning reptile people.
The Zionist control of American foreign policy is neither a secret or conspiracy and one need not look any further than AIPAC for proof:
"Met with Jim Baker (Secretary of State) and I cut a deal with him. I got, besides the $3 billion, you know they're looking for the Jewish votes, and I'll tell him whatever he wants to hear ... Besides the $10 billion in loan guarantees which was a fabulous thing, $3 billion in foreign, in military aid, and I got almost a billion dollars in other goodies that people don't even know about"
David Steiner, former AIPAC president, 1992
Steiner on negotiating with the Clinton administration saying AIPAC had "a dozen people in (the Clinton) campaign, in the headquarters... in Little Rock, and they're all going to get big jobs"
Steiner was forced to resign after these comments were taped by Haim Katz.
AIPAC has been called "a major force in shaping United States policy in the Middle East." by the New York Times, 1987 and "the second-most powerful influence group in Washington, D.C" by Fortune Magazine, 1997.
"pushing the (War in Iraq) from the beginning", "I don't think they represent the mainstream of American Jewish thinking at all, but because they are so well organized, and their members are extraordinarily powerful - most of them are quite wealthy - they have been able to exert power." - Jim Moran, Northern Virgina, D. Congressman on AIPAC
When the University of California Berkley voted to divest from investment companies providing military support to Israel last year, this is AIPAC's response:
"How are we going to beat back the anti-Israel divestment resolution at Berkeley? We’re going to make certain that pro-Israel students take over the student government and reverse the vote. That is how AIPAC operates in our nation’s capitol. This is how AIPAC must operate on our nation’s campuses."
AIPAC has also been caught passing on top-secret information to Israel (Lawrence Franklin espionage) in 2004. Those are just a handful of many examples. How can anybody deflect talk of Zionist influence as paranoid conspiracy when presented with factual evidence? Because the mainstream media doesn't pick up on it, that's why. AIPAC even has a shady history which goes back to when they were the American Zionist Council and the Kennedy administration asked them to register with the Justice Department as part of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. (this information was declassified in 2008). They still have not registered, even after the issue was mentioned once again in the fallout of the Lawrence Franklin scandal, and they are still a tax-exempt charitable/religious nonprofit because of it.
If 9/11 was ever conclusively proven to be connected with an Israeli intelligence operation, the 'official' response would likely be that it was a rouge operation that did not represent the interest of Israel and was covered up to protect US/Israeli relations. The public would hardly flinch and then go back to watching Teen Mom or Jersey Shore or whatever. If 9/11 was conclusively proven to be a product of the Israeli government (and a Zionist/Neocon shadow government within the US) and we severed relations with Israel then arrested all the conspirators on our soil, then the public would care. But that would never happen and would cause a number of problems including WWIII. Think about it, take our Jewish population for example. I guarantee they would be torn between their belief in Israel as a result of their faith and their belief in the USA their homeland which was betrayed by Israel. Half would likely still support Israel regardless and point to the shadow government also being involved and the other half would be against it. Meanwhile, the rest of the public would see Israel as an enemy and those who still supported her in the USA as traitors. "New Antisemitism" would most certainly be the result. I'm reading into this too much.
Back to reality, AIPAC is a realistic threat to our country with a powerful grip and a lot of support. I do believe with enough exposure we can possibly loosen than grip. They are powerful, but they are also pretty small (well they look small from the outisde at least). AIPAC still hasn't given up on convincing the US to go to war with Iran just as they persisted to go to war with Iraq for over a decade. There is no reason for the US to go to war with any country who is not a threat to us. If Israel pulled of a nuclear false flag and, for example, blamed it on Iran (despite their lack of nukes, maybe say they got one from North Korea) then the US would be 'forced' to support their 'ally' and thus begins WWIII anyways. I really am afraid of this scenario.
Continuing to mention NWO makes one look paranoid. Globalization is very real obviously and the Zinoists/Neocons most certainly have a globalist agenda which involves suppressing China/Russia and controlling all the oil fields. If you want to call them the NWO just don't do it around me because I want to be taken seriously and not associated with the reptile people, Illuminati, or Freemason thing. Secret societies are obviously real but stop giving them so much credit.
The Zionist control of American foreign policy is neither a secret or conspiracy and one need not look any further than AIPAC for proof:
"Met with Jim Baker (Secretary of State) and I cut a deal with him. I got, besides the $3 billion, you know they're looking for the Jewish votes, and I'll tell him whatever he wants to hear ... Besides the $10 billion in loan guarantees which was a fabulous thing, $3 billion in foreign, in military aid, and I got almost a billion dollars in other goodies that people don't even know about"
David Steiner, former AIPAC president, 1992
Steiner on negotiating with the Clinton administration saying AIPAC had "a dozen people in (the Clinton) campaign, in the headquarters... in Little Rock, and they're all going to get big jobs"
Steiner was forced to resign after these comments were taped by Haim Katz.
AIPAC has been called "a major force in shaping United States policy in the Middle East." by the New York Times, 1987 and "the second-most powerful influence group in Washington, D.C" by Fortune Magazine, 1997.
"pushing the (War in Iraq) from the beginning", "I don't think they represent the mainstream of American Jewish thinking at all, but because they are so well organized, and their members are extraordinarily powerful - most of them are quite wealthy - they have been able to exert power." - Jim Moran, Northern Virgina, D. Congressman on AIPAC
When the University of California Berkley voted to divest from investment companies providing military support to Israel last year, this is AIPAC's response:
"How are we going to beat back the anti-Israel divestment resolution at Berkeley? We’re going to make certain that pro-Israel students take over the student government and reverse the vote. That is how AIPAC operates in our nation’s capitol. This is how AIPAC must operate on our nation’s campuses."
AIPAC has also been caught passing on top-secret information to Israel (Lawrence Franklin espionage) in 2004. Those are just a handful of many examples. How can anybody deflect talk of Zionist influence as paranoid conspiracy when presented with factual evidence? Because the mainstream media doesn't pick up on it, that's why. AIPAC even has a shady history which goes back to when they were the American Zionist Council and the Kennedy administration asked them to register with the Justice Department as part of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. (this information was declassified in 2008). They still have not registered, even after the issue was mentioned once again in the fallout of the Lawrence Franklin scandal, and they are still a tax-exempt charitable/religious nonprofit because of it.
If 9/11 was ever conclusively proven to be connected with an Israeli intelligence operation, the 'official' response would likely be that it was a rouge operation that did not represent the interest of Israel and was covered up to protect US/Israeli relations. The public would hardly flinch and then go back to watching Teen Mom or Jersey Shore or whatever. If 9/11 was conclusively proven to be a product of the Israeli government (and a Zionist/Neocon shadow government within the US) and we severed relations with Israel then arrested all the conspirators on our soil, then the public would care. But that would never happen and would cause a number of problems including WWIII. Think about it, take our Jewish population for example. I guarantee they would be torn between their belief in Israel as a result of their faith and their belief in the USA their homeland which was betrayed by Israel. Half would likely still support Israel regardless and point to the shadow government also being involved and the other half would be against it. Meanwhile, the rest of the public would see Israel as an enemy and those who still supported her in the USA as traitors. "New Antisemitism" would most certainly be the result. I'm reading into this too much.
Back to reality, AIPAC is a realistic threat to our country with a powerful grip and a lot of support. I do believe with enough exposure we can possibly loosen than grip. They are powerful, but they are also pretty small (well they look small from the outisde at least). AIPAC still hasn't given up on convincing the US to go to war with Iran just as they persisted to go to war with Iraq for over a decade. There is no reason for the US to go to war with any country who is not a threat to us. If Israel pulled of a nuclear false flag and, for example, blamed it on Iran (despite their lack of nukes, maybe say they got one from North Korea) then the US would be 'forced' to support their 'ally' and thus begins WWIII anyways. I really am afraid of this scenario.
Continuing to mention NWO makes one look paranoid. Globalization is very real obviously and the Zinoists/Neocons most certainly have a globalist agenda which involves suppressing China/Russia and controlling all the oil fields. If you want to call them the NWO just don't do it around me because I want to be taken seriously and not associated with the reptile people, Illuminati, or Freemason thing. Secret societies are obviously real but stop giving them so much credit.
-
Moreflourideplease
- Protesting War
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:50 pm
- Location: NYC
Re: Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at
Thanks for letting me know there's nothing to see there.
Re: Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at
Then that would make politicians who have used this phrase paranoid. LOL.Continuing to mention NWO makes one look paranoid.
Time to get your head out of your ass.
The Globalists' Agenda - New World Order Quotes from Politicians (1950 - 2009) Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ptcp07v_w-w
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.
-
sorrysorry
- End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:32 pm
Re: Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at
PlutoCharon wrote:Continuing to mention NWO makes one look paranoid. Globalization is very real obviously and the Zinoists/Neocons most certainly have a globalist agenda which involves suppressing China/Russia and controlling all the oil fields. If you want to call them the NWO just don't do it around me because I want to be taken seriously and not associated with the reptile people, Illuminati, or Freemason thing. Secret societies are obviously real but stop giving them so much credit.
I believe once you get to a particular post count in this forum, above the avatar it says "Fighting the NWO daily" lol.
What do you think is the goal of globalization/the U.N./IMF/World Bank exactly? No New World Order? It's not like the agenda is hidden either. Globalization is packaged and encouraged in a positive light, with buzz words/phrases like: multiculturalism, unity, "one love one world one tribe", "no race but the human race". Not to mention the words "New World Order" coming from the elite horses' mouths a few times. At this point globalization and NWO are the same to me.
As for topics that discredit movements, some are obvious while others are subjective. Many in the antiwar movement automatically consider 911 truthers or holocaust revisionists discrediting fools. You have to take baby steps in enlightening the target audience. When the basics sink in, that's when you give the unadulterated and harsh outline.
Edit: Drew beat me to it.
Let's make like a Legolas and kill the big Oliphant in the room. Corny puns are fun.
My opinions are not representative of other forum members. If my political incorrectness offends you...oh well.
-
dicktater
- Over the system
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:39 am
- Location: Lower Slobovia
- Contact:
Re: Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at
PlutoCharon, please note that this video has been divided into FOUR parts.Drew J wrote:Then that would make politicians who have used this phrase paranoid. LOL.Continuing to mention NWO makes one look paranoid.
Time to get your head out of your ass.
The Globalists' Agenda - New World Order Quotes from Politicians (1950 - 2009) Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ptcp07v_w-w
●▬▬▬▬▬▬★ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N★▬▬▬▬▬▬●
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
It's not just for breakfast any more.
"Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental
opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a
distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every
change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic
plan of reducing [a people] to slavery."
~~ Thomas Jefferson
"Power kills, absolute power kills absolutely. The more power a government has, the more it can arbitrarily make war on others and murder foreign and domestic subjects. The more that government is constrained and diffused, the less tendency there is for them to commit genocide."
~~ Art Crino
When they put you in the internment camp, if you're really, really good, they might let you watch Dancing With The Stars.
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
It's not just for breakfast any more.
"Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental
opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a
distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every
change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic
plan of reducing [a people] to slavery."
~~ Thomas Jefferson
"Power kills, absolute power kills absolutely. The more power a government has, the more it can arbitrarily make war on others and murder foreign and domestic subjects. The more that government is constrained and diffused, the less tendency there is for them to commit genocide."
~~ Art Crino
When they put you in the internment camp, if you're really, really good, they might let you watch Dancing With The Stars.
-
Moreflourideplease
- Protesting War
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:50 pm
- Location: NYC
Re: Remember the Jewish lady from the Donahue Show? look at
PlutoCharon, why if you are so put off by the suggestion of secret sects did you choose to use the names Pluto and Charon, both highly significant symbols in Freemasonry. Once I read the mythological significance of both, I wondered why anyone would want to associate themselves with either.