Anti-Neocons Forum

lol at your mom. Straight talker

she summed it up right!

i'm not willing to come out and say the joos are responsible for this or that (usually). but at some point you have to at least consider the question when the nationwide narrative is that muslims are responsible for all the violence, bloodshed, religious extremism, etc. the complete MSM story to all of us is exactly as she puts it ("those evil muslims want to take down america blah blah blah"). at some point you have to consider these things: 1. AIPAC's control over congress. 2. the disproportionate amount of wealth jews control compared to other ethnicities. 3. their grip on the media. 4. their role in the USS liberty, their role in lying us into the iraq war, and if you care about the retracted or forgotten reports of israelis being caught with bombs in vans on 9/11, filming 9/11 and dancing around etc.

i mean how would it look if we had muslim arabs in our defense department who were creating false evidence to lie us into a war with their enemy israel? and if they had a lobby that controlled our foreign policy, had a disproportionate amount of wealth compared to everyone else . . . i mean at some point you have to at least bring up these things about jews so that we can show that the muslims are not responsible for ANY problems this country now faces. it's just ridiculous how things can be turned on their heads like this where i'm watching everyone around me respond to a narrative that is just so blatantly and utterly false. but then when my friend refers to libya as liberia i kinda start to get it. i've been hanging out with real ignorant people in real life and it's getting old. starting to find more people who are cool and actually get it. a former liberal i know just read rand paul's book and appreciated his take on foreign policy. there is a political realignment happening, but the most important thing to me is that the racism and prejudice against muslims stop. it is insane and just irrational. who actually controls the banks, the media, and the congress? muslims???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

What she represents is how Zionism and the super sensitivity to it by the press, is actually causing antisemitism. People are blaming "the joos" instead of Israel. Yeh they're 2% of the US population so what? It's not because of the Jooish nature or genetics that these guys get pushed into power. It's because the STATE of Israel with the money, unregistered lobby, spy rings and data mining, etc with the money of Christian Zionist who are 33% of the populous, push for and places their own into positions of power in the US. Israel is a giant parasite on America.

That's cammy's mother?
Nice genes.
(There, I said it)

lots of makeup


nah shes hot just in the fact that she's so conservative. kinda girl that would kick your ass

Ry wrote:What she represents is how Zionism and the super sensitivity to it by the press, is actually causing antisemitism. People are blaming "the joos" instead of Israel. Yeh they're 2% of the US population so what? It's not because of the Jooish nature or genetics that these guys get pushed into power. It's because the STATE of Israel with the money, unregistered lobby, spy rings and data mining, etc with the money of Christian Zionist who are 33% of the populous, push for and places their own into positions of power in the US. Israel is a giant parasite on America.

its said that they wielded considerable political influence, money, and violence before israel... and indeed to acquire israel...

its said that they wielded considerable political influence, money, and violence before israel... and indeed to acquire israel...

No the Brits made Israel for the same reason they created East and West Pakistan. Only in that cases they made Muslim states out of areas of India and let them duke it out in a power vacuum of intentionally blurry borers. And they did it in the same manner drawling lines between religious fanatics. You can say the zionist got the Britsh to do it for them if you like. OR the Brits did it for themselves and they had overlapping interests. Placing a bunch of insane Jews in the Middle East was a guaranteed recipe for conflict which is what they wanted. Conflict = cash.

Europe was losing its colonies, they needed proxies to continue neo-colonialism. So they used religious groups, and set up regional puppet dictators. Creating Israel was also feeding off of the Holocaust myth which the allies needed for their own propaganda. If you go back and look at it,the zionist had been trying for over 100 years to make Israel, it didn't happen until it was beneficial to the Brits. All the reasons given were based on the holocaust. The Jews needed a homeland bla bla. Never mind the people already living there. The Brits wanted that oil and they want continued weapon sales and dependencies in the Middle East. Making Israel was the best way to ensure that. And coming to rescue "the jews" as a pretext for war was something no one was gonna question after the Holo-hype. No one but Eisenhower that is, as he knew better since he was in on it. Thus why he told the Brits and French to go fuck themselves after the 1954 invasion and 56 war in Egypt created by an Israeli false flag, that went forward anyway even though they had been busted! Israel gained its greatest influence however in 1963 after involving itself in the murder of JFK. Eisenhower's peace keeping troops from the UN remained patrolling Egypt and Israel until 1967, Days after they were removed LBJ Israel launched a plan for war again Israel started the was and there was an attempted false flag on a US ship to drag the US into the war on Israel's behalf but this FF was busted too as some of the people on the ship the USS Liberty survived. America replaced the Brits in terms of power and target for the parasite.

Ry wrote:

its said that they wielded considerable political influence, money, and violence before israel... and indeed to acquire israel...

No the Brits made Israel for the same reason they created East and West Pakistan. Only in that cases they made Muslim states out of areas of India and let them duke it out in a power vacuum of intentionally blurry borers. And they did it in the same manner drawling lines between religious fanatics. You can say the zionist got the Britsh to do it for them if you like. OR the Brits did it for themselves and they had overlapping interests. Placing a bunch of insane Jews in the Middle East was a guaranteed recipe for conflict which is what they wanted. Conflict = cash.

Europe was losing its colonies, they needed proxies to continue neo-colonialism. So they used religious groups, and set up regional puppet dictators. Creating Israel was also feeding off of the Holocaust myth which the allies needed for their own propaganda. If you go back and look at it,the zionist had been trying for over 100 years to make Israel, it didn't happen until it was beneficial to the Brits. All the reasons given were based on the holocaust. The Jews needed a homeland bla bla. Never mind the people already living there. The Brits wanted that oil and they want continued weapon sales and dependencies in the Middle East. Making Israel was the best way to ensure that. And coming to rescue "the jews" as a pretext for war was something no one was gonna question after the Holo-hype. No one but Eisenhower that is, as he knew better since he was in on it. Thus why he told the Brits and French to go fuck themselves after the 1954 invasion and 56 war in Egypt created by an Israeli false flag, that went forward anyway even though they had been busted! Israel gained its greatest influence however in 1963 after involving itself in the murder of JFK. Eisenhower's peace keeping troops from the UN remained patrolling Egypt and Israel until 1967, Days after they were removed LBJ Israel launched a plan for war again Israel started the was and there was an attempted false flag on a US ship to drag the US into the war on Israel's behalf but this FF was busted too as some of the people on the ship the USS Liberty survived. America replaced the Brits in terms of power and target for the parasite.

haha thats funny, one of my good friends has a grandfather who was a british spy, and get this, a diplomat to palestine... so thats all in line, but what has britian become today? are they really the hidden hand? is the US a corporation of britian? i think probably the people financing and benefitting the most have no alligiance to a piece of land... but then again there is the queen... is israel a distraction from this?

im ranting here but since it seems like ww3, and the classic situation is that bot sides are funded by the same people who benefit, do china, russia, and the US have the same "rulers"? the parrelells between russia and the US are stupidly obvious, corruption and corporatism, oligarcs and wars. id be more suprised if it wasnt in the same pocket. now china, who has all the interests on the globe tied to the US, an organized crime sydicate to rival any, and all the red flags of another piece of the same shit, is really hard to get a read on.. but im sure the infos available, i guess my question is, should the focus be on stopping finacial globalism as it already exists? or trying to prevent the finaciers from starting ww3 and actually secure i dunno what...

and the protocols just keep coming into my thoughts, i saw u mention a while back that they are fraudulent i was wondering what you were citing because i cant get a finger on the origin, and the longer i live the more they seem to be exactly what they claim