Page 1 of 1
Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:57 pm
by zeeek1
You know what I'm talking about Ryan. You have not addressed my question. You have not given proof.
Now shall I make a video on youtube taking YOU to the woodshed?
If you can't back up your statements, it's time to get proof or give a retraction sir.
Give the proof and get a paypal Xmas present, no proof and I lean on you until you retract your statement.
YOu have done much for me in terms of what is and is not but, I will not stand for the type of accusation you make without proof. It is destroying your credibility and I'm surprised that others missed this and have not called you out on it. Instead you make other videos on topics that have little impact compared to the one I'm taking you to task on.
So, time to buck up and so will I. You need $$ I merely ask for proof.
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:31 pm
by Faltizan
No you will not get an apology from Ryan.
He actually thinks a 757 flew into the Pentagon LOL! Pathetic.
He actually thinks there was no nanothermite involved in the implosion of the WTC towers!
Ryan is very bright but is stubborn and EXTREMELY hard headed. Emphasis on extremely.
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:02 pm
by Drew J
For 9-11 see
Dimitri Khalezov and
Field McConnel/Craig Oxley. They have the best solutions out there.
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:10 pm
by Ry
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:40 pm
by Drew J
Evidence that Flights AA 11 and AA 77 Did Not Exist on September 11, 2001
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And from that Field McConnell
topic
What makes you think you have seen any Boeing 757 wings my friend? The aircrafts on that day were not Boeing 757 but rather Boeing EC-135-C.
...and even planes at all, which they controlled via KU Band and no pilots required glass cockpit technology with precision guidance by way of the Hillary Clinton patented QRS-11 Gyrochip then from BEI Technologies then based in San Francisco and now part of the Inertial division of Systron Donner also based on the West Coast of the U.S. in California.
In other words, it likely was a plane that hit the Pentagon as well as the towers. The planes were not AA because they were switched out for planes that were chipped and could be guided by remote control therefore.
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 11:04 pm
by zeeek1
What is good is Ryan's focus onto the dark areas that need a light shining on them. What is bad is lack of evidence.
He has replied to my satisfaction on the other thread so there is no need to dabble back to 9/11 at this time.
His focus on 9/11 is again a light shining on evidence most wanting to be in the dark.
Happy Holidays. Merry Christmas, lets all try to get along.
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2013 3:32 pm
by general hoke
You mean there are still idiots who think it wasn't a plane? Wow watch one stupid video claiming it was not a plane then fold up and call real researchers stubborn for not agreeing with something assanine? That is powerful ignorant.
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:21 pm
by Zardoz
Im not sure how anyone can be sure of anything with all this deception around. We are barely settling on JFK. Perhaps part of the gimmick is to keep people guessing or just redirect you from thinking its an, Inside Job! Then we would start identifying sociopathy and supporting liberty. You know missing the forest for the trees?
Our species has been so brutalized to this ridiculousness of cutting your nose to spite your face its incredible. We have been warped!
Listen, I guess its not easy to track, but when you convert with someone are they thinking for the species or for themselves? Is their empathy? What level of deception do they think is going on? What is contrived culture? What is Real? Part of the Con game is to forge a culture that appears naturalistic. So to get to the truth you have to sift through identities. We are actors being given scripts to play...
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 8:13 am
by Ry
Dude a plane was witnessed hitting the building it made a plane size hole in the building and parts of the plane were still there after it hit. It was hit by a fucking plane. There is no motive of evidence of a missile and there is not a lack of evidence of a plane that claim came from loose change a film that got everything wrong about 911 and which avoided mentioning the word Israel like a plague.
Re: Is it time to take Ryan out to the woodshed?
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2013 5:34 am
by Raoul
I think some people were sold so kooky of a lie they cant get over it, believing so much of it must hurt.
