Starting a discussion on the Cologne Quagmire of NYE
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:44 pm
The Cologne Quagmire of New Years Eve 2015.
As has been discussed, the alternative media has never been as blatantly homogeneous and inept than currently right now. Everybody's on the Trump bandwagon, a lot of people (Corbett/Kokesh) aren't even talking about current issues, and everybody's yelling "The muslims are coming! The muslims are coming! Rape, plunder!"
I wanna start a dialogue to actually do some critical thinking, instead of being a little bitch and fixating on surface level shit on what are clearly multi-layered issues. I call it the "Cologne Quagmire" because the incident was a clusterfuck of multitudes, and we can't let the Feminists and White Knights control the narrative labeling the entire incident one of "sexual assault."
_____
What we know about this situation is that during NYE in Germany, there was a presumably coordinated incident where firecrackers were thrown to create panic and hysteria. Where after individuals - assumed to be of Arab or North African descent - engaged in acts of sexual assault and robbery/theft. Because of the perpetrator's background, there is massive hysteria towards "Muslims" and "refugees" as a whole who are blamed for the incident.
_____
1. If this incident took place 3 years ago, the first thing people would be questioning is who are these fireworks throwers? This sounds like a textbook act of agent provocateurism. Is it possible that elements with the State, or far right-wing parties, orchestrated this incident to "provoke" a situation?
2. According to most reports/claims, the perpetrators who threw the firecrackers are the same people who engaged in the groping and theft. In other words, one was organized to allow the other. So by definition, there is a conspiracy at work.
3. Assuming this was entirely coordinated, since when does a race or religion act as a unit? Whenever someone blames a race or religion for engaging in a conspiracy or crime, you know that is either grossly exaggerated or forged. Parties engage in conspiracies, not peoples. Parties who share a common goal or ideology.
4. You can't blame Muslims, Jews, Arabs or refugees for a conspiracy. A conspiracy involves individuals who knowingly or unknowingly (useful idiots) work towards a larger end. A "conspiracy" involving an entire race or religion can never work, because it lacks cohesion. The very idea that they are cohesive is a willful forgery or exaggeration. The people who believe in it, are the useful idiots. Which in some cases, may actually point towards who really is behind the conspiracy.
5. Of course, some may claim that the refugees or migrants do have a common ideology, and it is Islam. That because of their religion, they are engaging in systematic theft and sexual assault. This becomes a situation where you either believe that, or you're capable of nuanced thinking and you don't.
6. In other words, this entire situation is ideal for a divide and conquer strategy, and it ideal to bring people who are on the fence on to your side. If you are against migrants or Muslims, then this is the perfect scenario. Why would refugees want to engage in an coordinated act whereby their own refuge comes under jeopardy?
7. This whole incident, seems to an be an act of agent provocateurs. If not, then its the work of a gang. Poverty can lead to desperation and/or degeneracy. Migrants or even refugees, who are in the country but are alienated where they cannot sustain themselves (can't get work), may engage in coordinated acts as a means to getting their fill.
What are your thoughts? People need to look into this incident. Who were these people who engaged in the firecrackers and caused the panic? Even if they're migrants or Arabs, were they a gang or were they paid off?
As has been discussed, the alternative media has never been as blatantly homogeneous and inept than currently right now. Everybody's on the Trump bandwagon, a lot of people (Corbett/Kokesh) aren't even talking about current issues, and everybody's yelling "The muslims are coming! The muslims are coming! Rape, plunder!"
I wanna start a dialogue to actually do some critical thinking, instead of being a little bitch and fixating on surface level shit on what are clearly multi-layered issues. I call it the "Cologne Quagmire" because the incident was a clusterfuck of multitudes, and we can't let the Feminists and White Knights control the narrative labeling the entire incident one of "sexual assault."
_____
What we know about this situation is that during NYE in Germany, there was a presumably coordinated incident where firecrackers were thrown to create panic and hysteria. Where after individuals - assumed to be of Arab or North African descent - engaged in acts of sexual assault and robbery/theft. Because of the perpetrator's background, there is massive hysteria towards "Muslims" and "refugees" as a whole who are blamed for the incident.
_____
1. If this incident took place 3 years ago, the first thing people would be questioning is who are these fireworks throwers? This sounds like a textbook act of agent provocateurism. Is it possible that elements with the State, or far right-wing parties, orchestrated this incident to "provoke" a situation?
2. According to most reports/claims, the perpetrators who threw the firecrackers are the same people who engaged in the groping and theft. In other words, one was organized to allow the other. So by definition, there is a conspiracy at work.
3. Assuming this was entirely coordinated, since when does a race or religion act as a unit? Whenever someone blames a race or religion for engaging in a conspiracy or crime, you know that is either grossly exaggerated or forged. Parties engage in conspiracies, not peoples. Parties who share a common goal or ideology.
4. You can't blame Muslims, Jews, Arabs or refugees for a conspiracy. A conspiracy involves individuals who knowingly or unknowingly (useful idiots) work towards a larger end. A "conspiracy" involving an entire race or religion can never work, because it lacks cohesion. The very idea that they are cohesive is a willful forgery or exaggeration. The people who believe in it, are the useful idiots. Which in some cases, may actually point towards who really is behind the conspiracy.
5. Of course, some may claim that the refugees or migrants do have a common ideology, and it is Islam. That because of their religion, they are engaging in systematic theft and sexual assault. This becomes a situation where you either believe that, or you're capable of nuanced thinking and you don't.
6. In other words, this entire situation is ideal for a divide and conquer strategy, and it ideal to bring people who are on the fence on to your side. If you are against migrants or Muslims, then this is the perfect scenario. Why would refugees want to engage in an coordinated act whereby their own refuge comes under jeopardy?
7. This whole incident, seems to an be an act of agent provocateurs. If not, then its the work of a gang. Poverty can lead to desperation and/or degeneracy. Migrants or even refugees, who are in the country but are alienated where they cannot sustain themselves (can't get work), may engage in coordinated acts as a means to getting their fill.
What are your thoughts? People need to look into this incident. Who were these people who engaged in the firecrackers and caused the panic? Even if they're migrants or Arabs, were they a gang or were they paid off?
