The Wikileaks Word Frequency

Current events, politics, and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
MWB
Speaking out
Speaking out
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:32 pm

The Wikileaks Word Frequency

Post by MWB » Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:02 pm

Figuring out exactly how 9/11 was done is the work of crime investigators or conspiracy hobbyists who will endlessly go on discussing and debating every minuscule and intricate detail of the event to no avail. It doesn't take a structural engineer to tell you that two 110 story buildings and a 47 story steel skyscraper plummeting to the ground at nearly free-fall speed requires the assistance of explosives. All you need is two eyes that can see and a brain that thinks to come to that sound conclusion. This is why it is of my opinion that more emphasis should be placed on the "who" instead of the "how". It should be obvious to anyone that discovering 'who did 9/11' is infinitely more important than discovering how they did it.

Want to know who did it and why? Go here: http://www.theinfounderground.com/forum ... f=6&t=5367

User avatar
Ry
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
Posts: 34478
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: The Wikileaks Word Frequency

Post by Ry » Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:03 pm

That sums it up
Get The Empire Unmasked here

Ed
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:29 pm
Location: South Korea

Re: The Wikileaks Word Frequency

Post by Ed » Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:30 am

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/de ... d-reaction
Iran

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dismissed the Wikileaks revelations as "psychological warfare." Iran's foreign ministry spokesman thundered: "The enemies of the Islamic world are pursuing a project of Iranophobia and disunity. This project only protects the interests of the Zionist regime and its supporters." Still, the documents will reinforce the regime's world view by underlining the huge effort being made by the US to contain Iran by applying pressure for UN sanctions over its nuclear programme or stopping arms deliveries to groups like Hamas and Hizbullah. It will be harder to maintain the pretence of good relations with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states because of exposure of their fear of Tehran. Iran remains defiant and is not as isolated as Washington would like. It is influential in Iraq and has good relations with Turkey. It is clear that Barack Obama's efforts to reach out to it have failed, with some arguing he was never serious about engagement. The status quo looks volatile and threatening.

Israel
Israel has been largely untroubled by because US views on key Middle Eastern issues especially on Iran, Syria and Lebanon, are so close to its own. "Israel is not the centre of international attention," said Binyamin Netanyahu. "Normally, there's a gap between what is said publicly and what is said privately, but in this case, the gap is not large." The most significant revelation was that Israel believes that beyond a certain point attacking Iran would cause too much "collateral damage."Israel can be seen maintaining discreet contact with Gulf states and have an intriguing intelligence link to Saudi Arabia. It suits Israel that the Palestinian issue and Jewish settlements in the occupied territories do not feature prominently. The Palestinian Authority denied suggestions it acquiesced in Israel's war on Hamas in Gaza.
Turkey, who still have a decent relationship with Iran came out badly too...
Turkey

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan reacted furiously to US diplomatic cables that suggested he was a corrupt closet Islamist. As Turkey heads for elections next year, secular Republican opponents may try to exploit his evident discomfort.

The cables highlighted three principal issues. Erdogan's personal probity – he was reported to have eight secret Swiss bank accounts; the supposed Islamist agenda of the ruling AKP party; and Turkey's perceived drift away from the western alliance and closer embrace of countries such as Syria and Iran.

Erdogan's response was both to dismiss the cables as tittle-tattle, and to conjure conspiracy theories."The un-serious cables of American diplomats, formed from gossip, magazines, allegations and slander are spreading worldwide via the internet," Erdogan said. "Are there disclosures of state secrets, or is there another aim?" he askedd. "… Is it carrying out a veiled, dark propaganda? Are there efforts to affect, manipulate relations between certain countries?"
our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.

afisara
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:00 am

Re: The Wikileaks Word Frequency

Post by afisara » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:45 am

Is it possible Wikileaks is intentionally trying to create restrictions on our Internet freedoms? When you abuse a freedom, you lose it. Is that what Wikileaks is doing, so that the government will be forced to take steps to limit our freedom to communicate on the Internet?
__________________________
yahoo keyword tool ~ overture ~ traffic estimator ~ adwords traffic estimator
Last edited by afisara on Sat Dec 25, 2010 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply