Most Taboo subjects in Politics #1 the Holocaust

[Ry]

ry, dont you luv when these folks try to make you show and prove a negative????

I know, like what am i supposed to do film each page and read it to them to show what is Not on it? All one has to do is show where it is mentioned in ANY of the books to disprove my claim. No one has or will because it's not in any of the books just like I said.

[Rio]

So, you or whoever wrote this is claiming to have read all of their autobiographies? I find this highly doubtful. Can whoever said this, prove that the Holocaust was never mention in those memoirs? Probably not, because that would require actual research.

Wouldn't the onus be on you to prove that the Holocaust is mentioned in the memoirs, giving page numbers showing that you've done the research?

[Ry]

bumpy

[Ry]

Auschwitz The Comedy


For a longer more in depth video about three other camps see this More Than Taboo
It's too hot for Youtube.

<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/23066661? ... portrait=0" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0"></iframe><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/23066661">More Than Taboo</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user6039314">Ryantineocon</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>

[PlutoCharon]

6InTheMorning, can you prove that they did mention it? Because they most certainly did not. How do you know what we have researched or not? You're just assuming. Even if you find out for yourself they didn't mention it, you would just say it is irrelevant anyways so why even argue about it?

We can give you 6 million reasons why it was impossible

If you're going to be running an extermination camp, why treat people medically? Why not just throw them in gas chambers? If I was an SS leader in charge of such a task, I would want to make the exterminations as efficient as possible. The camp would be re-arranged for efficiency with the gas chamber having a symbolic 'assembly' line to carry it out. Otherwise you're wasting money at wartime. It wasn't efficient at all and was so complex that it would've been impossible to keep it a secret nor would there be a reason.

It's one of the biggest lies in history

[Ry]

OK finally on youtube under an alternative name, but look at how they blocked mine.





yet it works here and it is the exact same length. And I have the ability on all my names to break the 15 min mark as some of my other videos are 3hrs long.



funny it was too long on my youtube channel but on this nearly unheard of (new) one with less than 14 views on most of the videos it got through. Youtube censors certain USERS because of political CONTENT and they flag political dissidents. My friend had full permission to try to post the video.

[MHz]

Just out of curiosity, has anybody ever been able to accurately track the population shifts in and around Poland in those years. Particularly if the affluent Jews had migrated away from the coming war zone and the Jews that were there were newly immigrated ones from the east. In that the poor were being starved to death anyone with an offer to get to Poland and have work if they would simply register as being Jewish. Once in Poland they were the ones that ended up in the work camps.

http://www.blinkx.com/watch-video/benja ... zqSRqAxEpA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The above is based on the speech Benjamin Freedman gave in 1961. If his proposals are correct (and they aren't denied or challenged by anybody) then both wars were part of the plan to acquire a Jewish homeland. Even with the land finally acquired it was not the richest Jews in the World that moved there, it would be more like the poorest Jews of Europe were the settlers, same as the old west in America, the 'fodder and strong back' were the poorest that Europe had at the time. Migration brought on by manufactured hardships and promises of a 'better life' if you would just 'move there'. Some certainly got rich but the vast majority only saw a modest rise in living conditions. Using the coal towns as an example, about as close to being slavery as possible without there being actual chains.
The Jews that were rich and powerful would have been the newsmen and the politicians and the (big) business owners. Ones that operated in international affairs rather than the mom and pop bakeries qualifying for being part of the wheelers and dealers. If the was NY in the 1920's, they would be the Al Capone and the Law both at the same time with the objective being to keep the general population as poor and ignorant as possible. The norm for a two class society, not the norm for a Republic where talent is what guides a person's path through careers and riches are more evenly distributed.

[Ry]

busted censoring

[Rio]

Holocaust references have no place in today's politics

November 16, 2012

During this past election season, I witnessed something disturbing as I
was holding a sign to pass the sales tax for our schools. Mitt Romney
supporters were voicing their political beliefs to vehicles passing by.
As some vehicles were stopping at the intersection, a man in his vehicle stated back
his opinion. Then this back and forth freedom of speech turned a nasty corner.
The Obama supporter started to use NAZI references when referring to
Mitt Romney. This even included the NAZI salute as the light turned to green.
Not even once did he seem to think about using the red light to stop and think
about his own choices of expression.

According to the first amendment of the United States Constitution, a
US citizen has a right to speak his or her mind. But when does the right
become a lack of responsibility ?

[Ry]

I wish I had a dime for every time the example of the Nazis were used to signify evil.