Astronauts' tracks, trash seen in new moon photos

[dicktater]

Astronauts' tracks, trash seen in new moon photos

A spacecraft circling the moon has snapped the sharpest photos ever of the tracks and trash left behind by Apollo astronauts in their visits from 1969 to 1972.

http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=2278950" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The image below was found by following the link above. Can someone tell me why there seem to be no tire tracks behind the rover in this picture:



1000×1000 pixels version:

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/uploads/a17_lrv.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The picture is linked from this page:

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/?archives ... -Moon.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

-----

The picture is even more interesting after watching this:

Jay Weidner reveals how Kubrick faked the Moon Landings









Kubrick's Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick Part 1


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qySnL38JpOg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Ry]

40 years of dust.

We went to the moon brought back moon rocks. We've even sent a robot to Mars.

[MWB]

800 lbs of moon rocks, in over 30,000 samples, examined by over 400,000 geologists from a dozen countries over 40+ years. ALL OF THEM AGREE THAT THESE ROCKS ARE FROM THE MOON.

In many cases, the actual samples can be matched to the rocks picked up by the astronauts while being filmed.

And it simply was not possible to return rocks from the Moon by any method other than being picked up by astronauts and carried back.

You gotta be a moron to think that we didn't go there.

[dicktater]

40 years of dust.

Huh? The astreaunut's bootprints are plainly visible near the front of the rover in the inset (taken on the surface 40 years ago) of the 1000X1000 image. Bootprints in front of but, no tire tracks behind the rover?

[Whirled Peas]

Huh? The astreaunut's bootprints are plainly visible near the front of the rover in the inset (taken on the surface 40 years ago) of the 1000X1000 image. Bootprints in front of but, no tire tracks behind the rover?

40 years of dust.

didn't cover up the other tracks.

You gotta be a moron to think that we didn't go there.

[PlutoCharon]

Much like the Pentagon missile thing, far too many people religiously belief in an Apollo 11 hoax and they probably aren't going to change their mind anytime soon

Similar to the Pentagon missile, the evidence of a hoax is sparse and weak. It is 99% associated with Apollo 11 ignoring the subsequent Apollo missions. If the subsequent missions are not disputed, then why is Apollo 11 disputed? Furthermore there is a crapton of kooks who believe that near-earth orbits, the ISS, and space walks are all fake. They even say that the space suits have been scientifically proven not to function in a vacuum. The problem is they never provide a source. Nobody has ever scientifically proven this because the public cannot access the suits. They just repeat the same stuff verbatim.

The lack of stars, the "C" prop rock (with a horrible scratchy infant-drawn "C" if it were true), the waving flag (which isn't waving at all like the kooks say), the erased tapes (at a time when it was routine to re-use magnetic media). It's weak. Buzz Aldrin punched that heckler, I just don't believe he would have done that if it were a hoax.

Space walks are in the thermosphere of the Earth by the way. Still within the atmosphere. An orbit and 'zero gravity' is literally an object in continuous freefall around the Earth. Take some freaking college astronomy, even a community college astronomy class.

The moon is only 300k miles from the Earth. It doesn't seem like it would be difficult to get there at all. The anomolies could all be for various reasons. Photo stitching, color alterations, finding strange things that they may not want publicly revealed for whatever reason. Who knows. The moon is extremely close to the Earth and you can view its craters and glorious detail with even a crappy telescope. We went to the moon. Do you know who likes to repeat these conspiracy theories? Disinfoists. Take Eric Hufschmid for example (aka James Murdoch's brother-in-law). He promotes it along with 9/11 facts and disinfo (missile) and other kooky stuff like Lennon being replaced. He makes no distinction between Jews and Zionists and is highly anti-semitic. Repeating his stuff makes you a kook and an anti-semite by association and by design.

[Dissent]

anyone have an explanation for these?

[dicktater]

anyone have an explanation for these?

SiO2 based creature from one of Wezen's puppy planets?