Libya's Martyr Square - Why you must question everything you see on TeeVee news
http://current.com/community/93414895_l ... e-news.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This comment doesn't show up in the post but it did in my e-mail notifications from the site. Just thought I'd play devil's advocate and post it here for your consideration. There are a lot of Obama supporters on that site who are cheering the Libyan war but I'm not sure if this user is one of them.
Current user
"Wanting the truth from news media is something you and I agree on. No matter who it hinders or benefits, I believe we both just want facts from news outlets. I'm not so sure this gentleman is delivering the facts, though I believe he thinks he is and is sincere. He tells us the BBC footage is not Green Square, but he never shows us the real Green Square for comparison. Doesn't offering a side-by-side comparison sound like something you would want to see from someone making these claims? I know I would. The flags being waved do appear to be India's flag, but I was never able to tell for certain from this video if the flags had the Ashok Chakra (the 24-spoke wheel) in the center of the white area (and I was wearing my best glasses, too). I believe they may have been there, though, and I will give him that one. But a flag can be carried anywhere, so that proves nothing... even though it does *imply* he *may* be correct.
I have seen flags of that style and color in CNN footage which purported to be from Green Square, but without the Ashok Chakra. I have mentioned to my wife that it was not the flag of Libya. But I have also seen the Libyan flag in some of the same shots. Perhaps CNN made the same mistake as the BBC, or are "in on it," too. I don't know. All I'm saying is, I need something like palm trees in Wisconsin... or in this case, a 360 degree pan to show the differences in the physical location. Additionally, he did himself no favor by including the other crowds of people and making fun of what BBC may show tomorrow. He lost some credibility, in my eyes at least, by doing that. I believe he is sincere. I applaud his gumption for doing this, and I do like his style. But when making claims like this, gumption and style do not prove the case. Then again, he might be correct. But he was only able to *imply* the deception or error... he did not prove it.